Vesting for Prior, Independent and Honest Concurrent Use in the Nigerian Trademark Protection Law: Quagmire for the Consumer
Keywords:
Trademark, Likelihood of Confusion, Honest Concurrent use, Independent Use, Prior Use, Consumer ProtectionAbstract
Trademarks are tools of identity used to differentiate goods in the market place,
protect the integrity of the trademark owner and ensure that consumers are
protected by providing guidance to them with respect to the quality of goods
and services. Part of the function of trademark law is to protect consumers from
deception or the likelihood of confusion with respect to goods and services by
the use of marks to differentiate products in the market place. The exceptions to
trademark infringement created by Sections 5(4), 7 and 13(2) of the Nigerian
Trademarks Act are recognized as providing security for prior, independent and
honest concurrent use of similar or identical marks. These sections permit the
dual use of trademarks and therefore conflict with and undermine the consumer
protection function of trademark because when similar products are in the
market place, consumers would likely be deceived or confused. This work
which is doctrinal, attempts to critically analyze the position of the law in
protecting prior, independent and honest concurrent users and the conflicting
interests that would be created for consumers. It also recommends the
integration of factors utilized in other jurisdictions in resolving or avoiding this
conflict.